Connect with us

General News

Minority Accuses Government of Selective Justice in Akonta Case, Demands Equal Treatment Under the Law

Published

on

The Parliamentary Minority Caucus has accused the government of practicing selective justice following the High Court’s judgment in the case of The Republic v. Bernard Antwi-Boasiako and Akonta Limited.

Delivering a statement on the floor of Parliament on Tuesday, Deputy Minority Leader Patricia Appiagyei argued that state institutions appear to act more swiftly and aggressively when members of the political opposition are involved.

“The Minority Caucus has taken note of the judgment delivered by the High Court in the case of The Republic v. Bernard Antwi-Boasiako and Akonta Limited,” she stated.

According to Hon. Appiagyei, the matter extends beyond the prosecution of one individual and raises broader concerns about the fairness of Ghana’s justice system. She stressed that democracy can only thrive when citizens, particularly those on the losing side of political contests, have confidence that the law is applied consistently and impartially.

She maintained that if the government is genuinely committed to ending selective justice, it must demonstrate the same determination in prosecuting members of its own political ranks.

“When the law is applied only when convenient, then no citizen’s rights are secure, regardless of political affiliation. Public confidence in institutions that should outlive any administration is weakened,” she said.

The Minority also issued four key demands in response to the court’s ruling:

  • Attorney-General: Publish the government’s enforcement record on illegal mining cases involving individuals across the political divide to prove that the law is being enforced without bias.
  • Court of Appeal: Carefully examine issues raised in the case, including the alleged denial of legal counsel, the refusal to make a constitutional referral, and matters relating to bail, with what the Minority described as “equal and unflinching scrutiny.”
  • Judiciary: Clarify and reaffirm the legal threshold for constitutional referrals, taking into account the Supreme Court’s decision in the Zenator case.
  • The Ghanaian Public: Demand the same standards of justice that, according to the Minority, cleared Tsatsu Tsikata’s name in 2006 be applied consistently in current cases.

Hon. Appiagyei concluded by emphasizing that justice must not only be carried out but must also be visibly fair and applied equally to all citizens, regardless of political affiliation.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

General News

Kenneth Ashigbey Denies Influencing Wontumi Case, Condemns False Claims

Published

on

Chief Executive Officer of the Ghana Chamber of Mines, Ing. Kenneth Ashigbey,has strongly denied allegations that he influenced the High Court’s ruling in the case involving NPP Ashanti Regional Chairman Bernard Antwi-Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi.

In a press release issued on Tuesday, July 21, 2026, Ashigbey described as “completely false” reports claiming that his relationship with the trial judge influenced the court’s decision and that he had allegedly stated he was confident Wontumi would be jailed because the judge was his sister-in-law.

Ashigbey categorically rejected the claims, insisting he never made such a statement.

“I have never said, anywhere, at any time, that I was confident Wontumi will go to jail because the judge is my sister-in-law. That quote is a fabrication,” he stated.

He further clarified that the July 20, 2026 judgment in Republic v. Bernard Antwi-Boasiako (Wontumi), Kwame Antwi (At Large), and Akonta Mining Company Limited is entirely separate from a petition he filed together with Martin Kpebu, Edem Senanu, and Kwame Asiedu.

According to Ashigbey, their petition remains pending before a different court and has not yet been heard on its merits. He described attempts to connect the two cases as “deliberate mischief” aimed at misleading the public.

He also dismissed suggestions of a conflict of interest, stressing that he was not a party to the case that resulted in Wontumi’s conviction and therefore had no direct interest in its outcome.

“There could not have been any conflict-of-interest situation as is being alleged,” he stated, urging the public to refrain from dragging judges and their family relationships into public propaganda.

Ashigbey warned that such allegations undermine public confidence in Ghana’s justice system and called on citizens to allow the judiciary to perform its constitutional duties without interference.

Reaffirming his long-standing position on illegal mining, Ashigbey said his advocacy has remained unchanged since 2017. He maintained that individuals who organise, finance and benefit from illegal mining activities—the “kingpins”—should face the maximum punishment permitted under the law.

“For the past eight years, I have maintained the principled view that those who organise, finance and benefit (‘kingpins’) from illegal mining activities should be subject to the maximum sentence prescribed by law. I stand by that position without reservation,” he said.

He concluded by urging the public to disregard the false reports and instead focus on the substantive issues surrounding the fight against illegal mining and the rule of law.

110 Response – I was confident Wontumi will go to_260721_190440

Continue Reading

General News

Wontumi Was the Target, Not the Real Culprit – Ex-Lawyer Breaks Silence, Urges Appeal Against 20-Year Jail Term

Published

on

Former legal counsel for Charles Antwi Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi, has questioned the basis of his former client’s conviction and 20-year prison sentence, arguing that the punishment raises serious legal concerns and should be challenged on appeal.

In an exclusive interview after the judgment, lawyer Ohene Amankwaa Gyan described the conviction as a “sad day,” saying he was deeply disappointed by the outcome.
“I have heard people celebrate the conviction as a deterrent to illegal mining, but I question whether the actual culprit has been punished,” he said.

The lawyer queried the presence of the man who at the court openly admitted involvement in activities linked to the Samleboi enclave, he believes there are unanswered questions about whether the real perpetrators of the alleged illegal mining operations were held accountable.

He further questioned whether his former client had become the main target of the prosecution.
“Does it mean Wontumi was the target rather than the real culprit? Does it mean other persons could go untouched just to incriminate him,” he stated.

Ohene Amankwaa Gyan revealed that he is dissatisfied with the court’s judgment and has advised Wontumi’s current legal team to file an appeal against both the conviction and the sentence.

He disclosed that while he was still part of the defence team, they filed an appeal after the trial judge issued a submission of no case to answer, but said the application had not yet been determined.

Expressing optimism, the lawyer said a fresh appeal could produce a favourable outcome if pursued diligently.
Addressing claims that he withdrew from the case because he anticipated defeat, the former counsel dismissed the speculation, insisting that no lawyer could predict a judge’s final decision.
He explained that his withdrawal was solely based on his client’s own decision and not because he foresaw a losing case.

He added that any appeal would likely challenge both the conviction and the sentence, with possible outcomes including the quashing of the conviction, a reduction of the prison term, or even an enhancement of the sentence, depending on the appellate court’s findings.
Despite the uncertainty, the former lawyer maintained that he remains hopeful Wontumi could obtain a positive outcome if his lawyers proceed with an appeal. has advised Wontumi’s current legal team to file an appeal against both the conviction and the sentence.

He disclosed that while he was still part of the defence team, they filed an appeal after the trial judge dismissed their submission of no case to answer, but said the application had not yet been determined.
Expressing optimism, the lawyer said a fresh appeal could produce a favourable outcome if pursued diligently.

Addressing claims that he withdrew from the case because he anticipated defeat, the former counsel dismissed the speculation, insisting that no lawyer could predict a judge’s final decision.
He explained that his withdrawal was solely based on his client’s own decision and not because he foresaw a losing case.

He added that any appeal would likely challenge both the conviction and the sentence, with possible outcomes including the quashing of the conviction, a reduction of the prison term, or even an enhancement of the sentence, depending on the appellate court’s findings.
Despite the uncertainty, the former lawyer maintained that he remains hopeful Wontumi could obtain a positive outcome if his lawyers proceed with an appeal.

Continue Reading

General News

Notary Public Status Is a Privilege, Not a License to Be Careless — Ohene Amankwaa Warns Lawyers

Published

on

Legal practitioner Ohene Amankwaa Gyan has described the appointment of a Notary Public as a prestigious honour that comes with enormous responsibility, urging beneficiaries to uphold the highest standards of integrity and professionalism.

Speaking in an exclusive interview after receiving his Notary Public status, Amankwaa explained that a Notary Public licence is a special authorization granted by the courts to experienced lawyers who have diligently served at the Bar for more than 10 years, in accordance with the Notaries Public Act, 1960.
He noted that the appointment empowers lawyers to authenticate legal documents with an official seal, making the role critical to the administration of justice.

Expressing gratitude to the judiciary for the recognition, lawyer Amankwaa said he was honoured to be entrusted with such a prestigious responsibility.
He explained that the selection and appointment of Notary Public lawyers are based on a lawyer’s integrity, discipline, and professional record, adding that candidates undergo thorough scrutiny before being approved by the appropriate legal authorities.

According to him, the annual exercise, led by the Chief Justice and the Judicial Service, is intended to recognize lawyers who have distinguished themselves through exemplary service.
While celebrating the achievement, Amankwaa cautioned that the status should never be abused.
He warned that because Notary Public lawyers are relatively few, some people may attempt to exploit their official seals and authority for fraudulent purposes.

He also expressed concern that some Notary Public lawyers fail to properly scrutinize documents, especially those involving relatives or people they know personally, saying such negligence undermines the credibility of the office urged all beneficiaries to remain vigilant and exercise due diligence at all times, stressing that any abuse of the privilege or failure to follow the law could result in the withdrawal of their licence by the relevant authorities.
“Being a Notary Public is an honour worth celebrating, but it is also a responsibility that demands integrity, discipline and strict adherence to the law,” he emphasized.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 KPDOnline. Powered by AfricaBusinessFile