Connect with us

General News

‘Impunity Is Not Over’ — CAGG Raises Fresh Alarm Over Illegal Mining

Published

on

The Ghana Coalition Against Galamsey (CAGG) has dismissed the government’s claim that the “era of impunity is over” in the fight against illegal mining, arguing that widespread galamsey activities across several parts of the country prove that lawlessness remains deeply entrenched.

In a statement issued in Accra on Monday, July 20, the coalition acknowledged what it described as notable progress by the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources but maintained that enforcement efforts remain inconsistent and inadequate to effectively protect Ghana’s forests, rivers and mining communities.

According to CAGG, the success of the anti-galamsey campaign will not be measured by official announcements but by sustained, impartial enforcement against offenders, regardless of their political or financial influence.

“Ghana’s forests, rivers and mining communities are not protected by press briefings. They are protected by sustained, fearless and uniform enforcement, applied equally in every region, against every excavator, and irrespective of whose interests stand in the way,” the coalition stated.

Achimota Forest Decision Praised

The coalition commended the government for revoking Executive Instrument (E.I.) 144, as amended by E.I. 234, which had removed portions of the Achimota Forest Reserve from protected status. It described the Cabinet’s decision as a significant step toward preserving one of Accra’s most important ecological assets.

CAGG also welcomed the Attorney-General’s decision to withdraw charges against the “Atronsu Five” and urged both the Attorney-General and the Inspector-General of Police to ensure justice for 13-year-old Pious Nketia Nkansah, who was allegedly murdered.

Forest Reserves Still Under Siege

Despite ongoing operations to remove illegal miners from forest reserve “red zones,” the coalition warned that several protected areas remain under serious threat.

It identified the Atewa Range Forest Reserve, Cape Three Points Forest Reserve, Afao Hills Forest Reserve and the Draw River Forest Reserve as hotspots where illegal mining continues to pose a major environmental risk.

To strengthen conservation efforts, CAGG called for increased funding for the Forestry Commission, the establishment of permanent security camps within forest reserves and renewed efforts to fulfil government’s pledge to upgrade Atewa Forest into a national park.

Illegal Mining Continues Across Regions

Rejecting the Ministry’s assertion that impunity has ended, the coalition pointed to continued illegal mining activities in the Eastern, Ashanti, Bono and Western regions.

According to CAGG, illegal mining remains active around the Birim, Densu and Ayensu river basins, near the Bui Hydroelectric Dam, around Lake Bosomtwe and within the Ahwiren wetlands.

The group also questioned what it described as selective enforcement and urged President John Dramani Mahama to ensure that all individuals implicated in illegal mining offences are investigated and prosecuted without fear or favour.

Questions Raised Over NAIMOS

CAGG further expressed concern about the operations of the National Anti-Illegal Mining Operations Secretariat (NAIMOS).

Although it acknowledged the secretariat’s reported record of conducting more than 200 operations, the coalition said allegations of selective enforcement and claims that seized excavators had been returned to offenders after payments deserve immediate investigation.

It urged NAIMOS to publicly respond to the allegations and improve transparency by publishing details of its complaint-handling procedures and enforcement outcomes.

Police and Local Authorities Urged to Do More

The coalition also criticised what it described as weak enforcement by sections of the Ghana Police Service, arguing that deploying additional Blue Water Guards alone would not solve the galamsey problem unless intelligence gathered from the field results in swift arrests and prosecutions.

It called for tighter supervision of police commanders in mining districts, disciplinary action against officers who fail to enforce the law, stricter regulation of excavator movements and tighter controls over fuel supplies to illegal mining operators.

Coalition Calls for Stronger Reforms

While welcoming government’s plans to amend the Minerals and Mining Act, 2006 (Act 703), CAGG insisted that the revised legislation must provide stronger protection for forests, water bodies and mining communities.

The coalition also called for the publication of the Constitutional Review Committee’s report, the prosecution of alleged galamsey kingpins, greater transparency in environmental governance and the regular release of reports on water quality, forest conditions and prosecutions.

CAGG reaffirmed its willingness to work with the government to strengthen environmental protection but cautioned that failure to decisively tackle illegal mining could have devastating long-term consequences for the country.

“We either deal with this menace or we perish, because without clean water, clean air and standing forests, we are done as a people,” the statement concluded.







General News

Kenneth Ashigbey Denies Influencing Wontumi Case, Condemns False Claims

Published

on

Chief Executive Officer of the Ghana Chamber of Mines, Ing. Kenneth Ashigbey,has strongly denied allegations that he influenced the High Court’s ruling in the case involving NPP Ashanti Regional Chairman Bernard Antwi-Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi.

In a press release issued on Tuesday, July 21, 2026, Ashigbey described as “completely false” reports claiming that his relationship with the trial judge influenced the court’s decision and that he had allegedly stated he was confident Wontumi would be jailed because the judge was his sister-in-law.

Ashigbey categorically rejected the claims, insisting he never made such a statement.

“I have never said, anywhere, at any time, that I was confident Wontumi will go to jail because the judge is my sister-in-law. That quote is a fabrication,” he stated.

He further clarified that the July 20, 2026 judgment in Republic v. Bernard Antwi-Boasiako (Wontumi), Kwame Antwi (At Large), and Akonta Mining Company Limited is entirely separate from a petition he filed together with Martin Kpebu, Edem Senanu, and Kwame Asiedu.

According to Ashigbey, their petition remains pending before a different court and has not yet been heard on its merits. He described attempts to connect the two cases as “deliberate mischief” aimed at misleading the public.

He also dismissed suggestions of a conflict of interest, stressing that he was not a party to the case that resulted in Wontumi’s conviction and therefore had no direct interest in its outcome.

“There could not have been any conflict-of-interest situation as is being alleged,” he stated, urging the public to refrain from dragging judges and their family relationships into public propaganda.

Ashigbey warned that such allegations undermine public confidence in Ghana’s justice system and called on citizens to allow the judiciary to perform its constitutional duties without interference.

Reaffirming his long-standing position on illegal mining, Ashigbey said his advocacy has remained unchanged since 2017. He maintained that individuals who organise, finance and benefit from illegal mining activities—the “kingpins”—should face the maximum punishment permitted under the law.

“For the past eight years, I have maintained the principled view that those who organise, finance and benefit (‘kingpins’) from illegal mining activities should be subject to the maximum sentence prescribed by law. I stand by that position without reservation,” he said.

He concluded by urging the public to disregard the false reports and instead focus on the substantive issues surrounding the fight against illegal mining and the rule of law.

110 Response – I was confident Wontumi will go to_260721_190440

Continue Reading

General News

Wontumi Was the Target, Not the Real Culprit – Ex-Lawyer Breaks Silence, Urges Appeal Against 20-Year Jail Term

Published

on

Former legal counsel for Charles Antwi Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi, has questioned the basis of his former client’s conviction and 20-year prison sentence, arguing that the punishment raises serious legal concerns and should be challenged on appeal.

In an exclusive interview after the judgment, lawyer Ohene Amankwaa Gyan described the conviction as a “sad day,” saying he was deeply disappointed by the outcome.
“I have heard people celebrate the conviction as a deterrent to illegal mining, but I question whether the actual culprit has been punished,” he said.

The lawyer queried the presence of the man who at the court openly admitted involvement in activities linked to the Samleboi enclave, he believes there are unanswered questions about whether the real perpetrators of the alleged illegal mining operations were held accountable.

He further questioned whether his former client had become the main target of the prosecution.
“Does it mean Wontumi was the target rather than the real culprit? Does it mean other persons could go untouched just to incriminate him,” he stated.

Ohene Amankwaa Gyan revealed that he is dissatisfied with the court’s judgment and has advised Wontumi’s current legal team to file an appeal against both the conviction and the sentence.

He disclosed that while he was still part of the defence team, they filed an appeal after the trial judge issued a submission of no case to answer, but said the application had not yet been determined.

Expressing optimism, the lawyer said a fresh appeal could produce a favourable outcome if pursued diligently.
Addressing claims that he withdrew from the case because he anticipated defeat, the former counsel dismissed the speculation, insisting that no lawyer could predict a judge’s final decision.
He explained that his withdrawal was solely based on his client’s own decision and not because he foresaw a losing case.

He added that any appeal would likely challenge both the conviction and the sentence, with possible outcomes including the quashing of the conviction, a reduction of the prison term, or even an enhancement of the sentence, depending on the appellate court’s findings.
Despite the uncertainty, the former lawyer maintained that he remains hopeful Wontumi could obtain a positive outcome if his lawyers proceed with an appeal. has advised Wontumi’s current legal team to file an appeal against both the conviction and the sentence.

He disclosed that while he was still part of the defence team, they filed an appeal after the trial judge dismissed their submission of no case to answer, but said the application had not yet been determined.
Expressing optimism, the lawyer said a fresh appeal could produce a favourable outcome if pursued diligently.

Addressing claims that he withdrew from the case because he anticipated defeat, the former counsel dismissed the speculation, insisting that no lawyer could predict a judge’s final decision.
He explained that his withdrawal was solely based on his client’s own decision and not because he foresaw a losing case.

He added that any appeal would likely challenge both the conviction and the sentence, with possible outcomes including the quashing of the conviction, a reduction of the prison term, or even an enhancement of the sentence, depending on the appellate court’s findings.
Despite the uncertainty, the former lawyer maintained that he remains hopeful Wontumi could obtain a positive outcome if his lawyers proceed with an appeal.

Continue Reading

General News

Notary Public Status Is a Privilege, Not a License to Be Careless — Ohene Amankwaa Warns Lawyers

Published

on

Legal practitioner Ohene Amankwaa Gyan has described the appointment of a Notary Public as a prestigious honour that comes with enormous responsibility, urging beneficiaries to uphold the highest standards of integrity and professionalism.

Speaking in an exclusive interview after receiving his Notary Public status, Amankwaa explained that a Notary Public licence is a special authorization granted by the courts to experienced lawyers who have diligently served at the Bar for more than 10 years, in accordance with the Notaries Public Act, 1960.
He noted that the appointment empowers lawyers to authenticate legal documents with an official seal, making the role critical to the administration of justice.

Expressing gratitude to the judiciary for the recognition, lawyer Amankwaa said he was honoured to be entrusted with such a prestigious responsibility.
He explained that the selection and appointment of Notary Public lawyers are based on a lawyer’s integrity, discipline, and professional record, adding that candidates undergo thorough scrutiny before being approved by the appropriate legal authorities.

According to him, the annual exercise, led by the Chief Justice and the Judicial Service, is intended to recognize lawyers who have distinguished themselves through exemplary service.
While celebrating the achievement, Amankwaa cautioned that the status should never be abused.
He warned that because Notary Public lawyers are relatively few, some people may attempt to exploit their official seals and authority for fraudulent purposes.

He also expressed concern that some Notary Public lawyers fail to properly scrutinize documents, especially those involving relatives or people they know personally, saying such negligence undermines the credibility of the office urged all beneficiaries to remain vigilant and exercise due diligence at all times, stressing that any abuse of the privilege or failure to follow the law could result in the withdrawal of their licence by the relevant authorities.
“Being a Notary Public is an honour worth celebrating, but it is also a responsibility that demands integrity, discipline and strict adherence to the law,” he emphasized.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 KPDOnline. Powered by AfricaBusinessFile