General News
Mahama Reflects on Father’s Detention, Reaffirms Lifelong Dedication to Justice and Human Rights
President John Dramani Mahama delivered a profoundly introspective and emotionally resonant keynote address during the opening ceremony of the 2026 Judicial Year and the 20th Anniversary celebrations of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights in Arusha, Tanzania, where he recounted how the detention of his father in the aftermath of Ghana’s 1966 military coup indelibly shaped his philosophical commitment to justice, constitutionalism, and the sanctity of human dignity.
Addressing an august gathering of African Heads of State, eminent jurists, diplomatic envoys, and representatives of civil society, President Mahama situated his remarks within both personal history and continental political experience, arguing that Africa’s democratic trajectory must be fortified by resilient institutions capable of safeguarding civil liberties against arbitrary exercises of power.
“I remain the child whose father was detained for serving his country and advising its leader,” he remarked, invoking his family’s experience as a symbolic representation of the human consequences of political instability and constitutional ruptures that characterized many post-independence African states.
The President observed that early exposure to the ramifications of political upheaval profoundly influenced his appreciation of institutional accountability and the fragility of fundamental rights in environments where judicial safeguards are weakened. He emphasized that the denial of justice to any individual inevitably produces cascading social consequences that extend beyond the immediate victim.
“When injustice is visited upon one person, it does not terminate with that individual,” he stated solemnly. “Rather, it reverberates through families, communities, and sometimes across successive generations.”
Mahama underscored that his political and humanitarian convictions were largely forged by these formative experiences, which reinforced his steadfast advocacy for judicial independence, procedural fairness, and the protection of constitutionally guaranteed freedoms. He stressed that governance systems must be designed to guarantee the right to fair hearing and equitable treatment under the law.
“It is precisely because of such lived experiences that I hold such strong conviction in due process, in the inviolability of the right to be heard, and in the protection of fundamental human rights,” he affirmed. “No citizen should be compelled to endure injustice simply because the institutions entrusted with safeguarding them have failed in their duty.”
Turning his attention to the broader African political landscape, President Mahama argued that the continent’s historical encounters with coups d’état, unlawful detentions, and abrupt constitutional interruptions should serve as enduring reminders of the imperative to strengthen democratic governance structures. He warned that sustainable development on the continent remains intrinsically linked to the consolidation of rule-based governance and judicial autonomy.
“Our continent’s historical experience teaches us that justice cannot be relegated to chance or political convenience,” he said. “Justice must be deliberately constructed, carefully protected, and firmly anchored in institutions that are impartial, independent, and resilient to political interference.”
He further praised the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights as a vital continental institution dedicated to protecting fundamental freedoms and ensuring state accountability under the provisions of the Banjul Charter. According to him, the Court represents not only a legal mechanism but also a moral symbol of Africa’s collective determination to uphold human rights standards.
“For me, this is not an abstract legal discourse,” President Mahama concluded. “This is deeply personal. It is about ensuring that no child in Africa must grow up witnessing a parent suffer injustice without the possibility of legal redress.”
General News
‘Cheap Justice?’ — Prof. Kwesi Yankah raises 4 ‘explosive’ concerns about Baffoe-Bonnie’s conduct
Professor Kwesi Yankah has launched a blistering critique of Chief Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie, raising a series of provocative questions about the conduct, public engagements and political neutrality of Ghana’s top judicial officer.
In a strongly worded opinion piece titled “Cheap Justice?”, the academic and former Minister of State for Tertiary Education questioned whether recent actions by the Chief Justice have weakened public confidence in the Judiciary.
Prof. Yankah’s intervention comes amid growing controversy over comments made by Baffoe-Bonnie during visits to state institutions, where he praised what he described as improved performance under the current administration while making comparisons with the previous government.
1. Has the Chief Justice crossed the political line?
At the heart of Prof. Yankah’s criticism is the Chief Justice’s recent engagement with state-owned enterprises.
According to Yankah, Baffoe-Bonnie appeared to venture beyond the traditional boundaries expected of the head of the Judiciary when he commented on the performance of public institutions and contrasted their current output with the situation under the previous administration.
The professor described the episode as the “last straw”, arguing that the Chief Justice appeared to have entered territory that was more political than judicial.
He suggested that such comments could damage the moral authority of the Judiciary, particularly when the institution is expected to remain independent and above partisan political contests.
2. ‘What happened to judicial neutrality?’
Prof. Yankah’s second major concern centres on the perception of judicial independence.
He questioned whether a Chief Justice who publicly comments on the performance of governments and state institutions could continue to command the same level of confidence from citizens across the political divide.
His concern comes against the backdrop of criticism from other prominent voices, including former Auditor-General Daniel Yaw Domelevo, who has warned that comments on politically sensitive matters could create a perception of bias if related issues eventually find their way before the courts.
For Yankah, the issue is not simply what the Chief Justice intended to say — but how those remarks could affect the public’s perception of the Judiciary.
3. From church dancing to political controversy
Prof. Yankah also revisited earlier moments involving Baffoe-Bonnie that, in his view, signalled a departure from the traditionally distant image associated with Ghana’s Chief Justice.
He recalled the Chief Justice’s appearance at a thanksgiving church service shortly after his appointment, where he was seen dancing and celebrating openly.
While acknowledging that there was nothing inherently wrong with such conduct, Yankah used the episode to paint a picture of a judicial leader who appeared increasingly comfortable operating in the public and political space.
He also referenced the Chief Justice’s participation in government delegations during international and national events, saying those developments had raised eyebrows even before the latest controversy.
4. The explosive ‘early retirement’ suggestion
Perhaps the most striking part of Prof. Yankah’s commentary was his suggestion that the controversy surrounding the Chief Justice could ultimately be interpreted as a signal for an early exit.
He noted that Baffoe-Bonnie has only a relatively short period left before his retirement and provocatively suggested that his controversial comments could be interpreted as an “application for early retirement.”
Yankah went even further, arguing that the Chief Justice’s conduct had already affected the prestige attached to his office.
His central warning is that once public confidence in the neutrality of the Judiciary begins to erode, rebuilding that confidence can become extremely difficult.
‘Cheap justice?’ — The bigger question
Prof. Yankah’s intervention has added another powerful voice to an increasingly heated national debate over the limits of public commentary by Ghana’s Chief Justice.
The Judicial Service has maintained that Baffoe-Bonnie’s observations were made in good faith and were not intended to undermine judicial independence, while other groups and individuals have called for restraint in his public engagements.
The Ghana Catholic Bishops’ Conference has also rejected calls for the Chief Justice to resign, arguing that he is entitled to his own convictions.
But Prof. Yankah’s latest intervention has ensured that the controversy is unlikely to disappear quietly.
For now, one question hangs over the Judiciary: can the Chief Justice remain politically neutral in the eyes of the public after making such politically charged observations?
Prof. Kwesi Yankah has fired the latest salvo — and the debate over Baffoe-Bonnie’s conduct is only getting hotter.
General News
FRIMPONG-BOATENG SPEAKS ON GALAMSEY — ‘ENFORCING ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS CARRIES POLITICAL COST’
General News
CHIEF JUSTICE COMMENTS STIR DEBATE — QUESTIONS RAISED OVER JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY
Chief Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie has come under intense public scrutiny after remarks about the performance of state institutions triggered concerns over the perceived political neutrality of Ghana’s Judiciary.
General News
ACCRA–KUMASI EXPRESSWAY HITS MAJOR MILESTONE — GAF COMPLETES 175.6KM CORRIDOR CLEARING
General News
ABLakwa GIVES AIRPORT VIP LOUNGE UPDATE — PROJECT SET FOR COMPLETION BY END OF 2026
-
General News2 weeks agoNana Adwoa Tutuwaa Named Global Humanitarian of the Year 2026
-
General News2 weeks agoPolice Arrest Suspect in GH¢1.1m Fake Gold Scam at Berekum
-
General News1 week agoGES Urged to Review Student Sexual Misconduct Rule Over Alleged Discrimination Against Boys
-
Entertainment7 days agoOswald Okaitei Explains the Real Vision Behind Ghana’s Black Star Experience
-
General News2 weeks agoOSP Assesses Extortion Allegations Against Afenyo-Markin
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoStonebwoy Is Not My Rival — Shatta Wale Reveals They Live Minutes Apart
-
Politics2 weeks agoStop The Personal Attacks!” — Vitus Azeem Demands Probe Into Sammy Gyamfi–Afenyo-Markin Feud
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoMzbel Says Age Gap Is No Barrier as She Opens Up About 19-Year-Old Admirer
