Deputy National Women’s Organiser of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Felicia Dzifa Tegah, has explained why she and some members of her team left the party’s delegates conference before proceedings began.

According to her, they were present at the venue and ready to participate in the conference but decided to leave after repeated delays and the lack of clear communication about when the programme would commence.

“We were at the NPP delegates conference, but we left because the proceedings kept getting delayed and there was no clear communication about when the event would begin,” she said.

Her comments come amid discussions surrounding the organisation of the NPP’s delegates conference, which brought together party delegates and officials for an important gathering.

Madam Tegah indicated that the decision to leave was influenced by the uncertainty surrounding the start of proceedings, rather than a deliberate attempt to boycott the event.

She stressed that they had made themselves available for the programme but became frustrated by the prolonged delays and the absence of timely information.

Her remarks are likely to fuel discussions about the organisation and communication of major party activities, particularly when such events involve delegates and senior party officials travelling from different parts of the country.

The NPP has been undertaking a series of activities aimed at strengthening its structures and repositioning the party ahead of future political contests.

Madam Tegah remains a key figure within the party’s Women’s Wing and has been involved in activities aimed at mobilising women and strengthening grassroots participation.

Former Deputy Communications Director of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), George Krobea Asante, has raised concerns over delays in the voting process, alleging that the situation was deliberately engineered to frustrate delegates.

In a statement, Mr. Krobea Asante said the voting process was “intentionally and artificially delayed,” describing the development as disappointing.

According to him, the delay created unnecessary difficulties for delegates who had gathered to participate in the exercise. His comments come amid concerns about the organisation and management of the voting process at the event.

“The voting process was intentionally and artificially delayed to frustrate the delegates which is so disappointing,” Mr. Krobea Asante said.

His remarks suggest concerns over whether the delays were merely administrative or formed part of a deliberate attempt to inconvenience participants. However, he did not provide specific evidence or identify individuals or groups he believes were responsible for the alleged delay.

The claim is expected to draw attention to the conduct of the voting exercise and the measures put in place to ensure an efficient process for delegates.

As of the time of publication, there was no response from the organisers addressing the allegation or providing an explanation for the reported delays.

Mr. Krobea Asante is a former Deputy Communications Director of the NPP and remains a commentator on political developments within the party.

The groundwork had been laid. The political machinery appeared to be in motion. Confidence was building. Then, in a dramatic twist, Boakye Agyarko’s bid for the NPP chairmanship came crashing down.

For Boakye Agyarko and his supporters, what appeared to be a carefully prepared political journey towards the coveted chairmanship position has ended in a stunning setback.

According to George Krobea Asante, former Deputy Communications Director of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), the groundwork for Agyarko’s ambition had been firmly established well before the contest.

The signs, he suggested, were there.

The preparations had been made. The political calculations were underway. The expectation of a strong showing appeared to be growing.

But then came the unexpected.

What was seemingly shaping up as a carefully mapped-out path to the NPP chairmanship suddenly took a dramatic turn, leaving Agyarko on the losing side of a contest that had generated considerable political interest.

The question now gripping political circles is: What went wrong?

How did a campaign that appeared to have significant groundwork behind it ultimately lose momentum at the crucial moment?

For supporters and observers who had watched the race unfold, the outcome has inevitably raised eyebrows and triggered fresh conversations about the internal dynamics, alliances and political calculations that can determine the fate of high-stakes party contests.

Krobea Asante’s comments have added another layer of intrigue to an already dramatic political episode.

The former NPP Deputy Communications Director’s account suggests that Agyarko’s journey to the chairmanship was not an impulsive venture. Rather, the foundation had reportedly been laid long before the final showdown.

Yet politics, as the saying goes, can change in the blink of an eye.

And in this case, something did.

The groundwork was there. The ambition was clear. The expectations were high. But the final result delivered a shock.

Boakye Agyarko’s chairmanship defeat has therefore opened a new chapter of debate within the NPP, with attention now turning to the events and political dynamics that transformed a seemingly promising bid into a dramatic loss.

One thing is certain: the chairmanship battle may be over, but the questions surrounding Agyarko’s unexpected defeat are far from settled.

New Patriotic Party (NPP) Third Vice Chairperson, Nana Akomea, has disclosed that he has not received an update on the report of the party’s National Disciplinary Committee regarding former presidential aspirant Kennedy Agyapong.

According to him, the committee, which was tasked to investigate petitions against the former Assin Central lawmaker, was initially given two weeks to complete its work but later requested an extension.

Speaking on the matter, Nana Akomea said he was unaware whether the committee had submitted its findings following the extension.

“Frankly, I haven’t had any update. They were given a two-week period… and I know at the next council meeting there was a report that they had asked for an extension,” he said.

He explained that he would refrain from expressing his personal position on the matter until the committee presents its recommendations to the party’s National Council.

Nana Akomea noted that commenting on the case before the committee concludes its work could prejudice the process.

He further indicated that the NPP remains open to reconciliation with aggrieved members, including those who may have fallen out with the party.

However, he stressed that reconciliation requires a willingness from the individuals involved to engage with the party and work towards moving forward.

The disciplinary case follows petitions filed against Mr Agyapong over comments some party members considered detrimental to the unity and cohesion of the NPP.

President John Dramani Mahama has granted presidential pardon to 863 convicted persons as part of activities commemorating Ghana’s 70th Independence Anniversary.

According to a statement signed by Felix Kwakye Ofosu, Spokesperson to the President and Minister for Government Communications, the decision was taken under Article 72(1) of the 1992 Constitution and after consultation with the Council of State.

Hundreds to Benefit from Presidential Mercy

The pardon covers several categories of convicted persons, with 819 first offenders receiving outright release.

Also benefiting are 13 persons aged 70 years and above, who have been granted outright release, while six seriously ill inmates will also be released.

The statement further indicates that 11 death sentences will be commuted to life imprisonment, while six life sentences will be reduced to 20-year definite terms.

Petitions and Special Cases Included

Two persons under special recommendation will receive outright release, while three petitions and three other cases are also covered by the presidential decision.

In total, the various categories account for the 863 convicted persons granted presidential pardon.

State Institutions Directed to Act

The Presidency said the decision forms part of Ghana’s commemoration of its 70th Independence Anniversary, describing the gesture as an act of mercy and national reflection.

Relevant state institutions have been directed to take the necessary steps to implement the President’s decision and give effect to the pardons.