Connect with us

General News

Afenyo-Markin sues Sammy Gyamfi and Multimedia Group over alleged defamatory remarks

Published

on

Minority Leader of Parliament, Alexander Afenyo-Markin, has filed a libel suit at the High Court in Accra against the Chief Executive Officer of the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), Samuel Adu Gyamfi, popularly known as Sammy Gyamfi, and Multimedia Group Limited.

The suit follows alleged defamatory remarks made by Sammy Gyamfi during the Saturday, August 22, 2026 edition of JoyNews’ Newsfile, which was hosted by Samson Lardy Anyenini.

According to the Statement of Claim, Afenyo-Markin, who describes himself as a legal practitioner, prominent public figure, fourth-term Member of Parliament and former Majority Leader, says he has built a reputation for integrity, honesty, professionalism and competence in his legal and public career.

He also states that he is a traditional leader in the Effutu Traditional Area and has served as Third Deputy Speaker of the ECOWAS Parliament.

The suit identifies Sammy Gyamfi as the first defendant and Multimedia Group Limited, operators of Joy 99.7 FM and JoyNews TV, as the second defendant.

Alleged “extortionist” remarks

Afenyo-Markin’s case centres on comments allegedly made by Sammy Gyamfi during a discussion about GoldBod’s financial performance and criticism surrounding the institution.

The plaintiff claims that, in response to a question about GoldBod’s reported profits and liabilities, Sammy Gyamfi launched what the suit describes as an “unscathing attack” on him and referred to him as an “extortionist.”

The Statement of Claim says Sammy Gyamfi further justified the description by indicating that he had appeared on Newsfile many times and had held numerous press conferences on political issues but had never previously used the word “extortion” against any of his critics.

The plaintiff also claims that Sammy Gyamfi questioned why Afenyo-Markin had not challenged or threatened to sue him over his previous statements.

The court documents further quote Sammy Gyamfi as saying that there were underlying issues between him and Afenyo-Markin which the public did not know about.

The suit also alleges that Sammy Gyamfi challenged Afenyo-Markin and his supporters to debate the matter, describing himself as a “consummate democrat” who was prepared to engage in debate.

When the host sought clarification on whether Sammy Gyamfi was indeed calling the Minority Leader an “extortionist”, the Statement of Claim says he responded affirmatively and maintained that Afenyo-Markin could not challenge him because he knew what had been said was true.

The plaintiff further cites remarks in which Sammy Gyamfi allegedly encouraged the host, a lawyer, to represent Afenyo-Markin and sue him so that he could substantiate the allegation.

The suit also quotes Sammy Gyamfi as saying the statement was not an insult but that he was “speaking about what has happened and he knows.”

Afenyo-Markin denies extortion allegation

Afenyo-Markin strongly denies the allegations, describing the statements as false and defamatory.

He argues that the categorical description of him as an “extortionist”, without identifying when, where or from whom he allegedly extorted anything, amounts to defamation.

The plaintiff further argues that Sammy Gyamfi’s reference to unspecified “underlying issues” did not provide a legitimate basis for the allegation.

According to the Statement of Claim, the plaintiff believes the remarks were made with knowledge that they were defamatory and without proof to support them.

He also rejects the suggestion that his failure to immediately respond to previous criticisms could be interpreted as an admission that the allegations were true.

Alleged implications of the publication

The suit states that people who heard or watched the broadcast would have understood the allegations to mean that Afenyo-Markin is an extortionist and habitually engages in extortion.

The plaintiff further says the statements created the impression that he uses his political position and influence to exert improper pressure on public institutions and officials, engages in secret or behind-the-scenes negotiations for improper purposes, and improperly intervenes in the affairs of public institutions.

He also argues that the remarks portrayed him as someone who abuses the influence associated with his position and conducts himself in a manner inconsistent with the honesty and integrity expected of a legal practitioner and senior public official.

Claims of malicious publication

Afenyo-Markin alleges that the statements were published maliciously.

Among the particulars of malice cited in the Statement of Claim are the alleged deliberate use of the word “extortionist” in connection with his criticism of financial losses involving GoldBod, the repetition of the allegation after the host questioned Sammy Gyamfi about it, and the alleged assertion that Sammy Gyamfi possessed evidence to support his claims.

The plaintiff also cites the alleged challenge to him to “dare” Sammy Gyamfi and argues that the statements were presented as facts rather than opinions.

He maintains that the publication was made in circumstances calculated to expose him to public contempt, ridicule, disrepute and opprobrium.

Social media circulation

The plaintiff says the alleged defamatory statements were broadcast on JoyNews TV during Newsfile and were subsequently circulated widely on social media platforms, including X, Facebook and YouTube.

According to the suit, recordings of the programme were watched, listened to, downloaded, shared and otherwise accessed by members of the public.

Afenyo-Markin therefore argues that the publication reached a substantial audience and continues to cause damage to his reputation.

He says the allegation is particularly serious because of his position as a legal practitioner and senior political figure.

The plaintiff claims that the publication has exposed him to hatred, ridicule, contempt and public disapproval while creating a false impression that he uses his political influence to extort or improperly negotiate with public officials.

Multimedia Group’s involvement

The suit also names Multimedia Group Limited as a defendant.

Afenyo-Markin argues that Multimedia, through its JoyNews platform, published or facilitated the publication of the alleged defamatory statements to its audience.

He further alleges that the second defendant, despite being aware of the legal consequences of the statements, did not stop Sammy Gyamfi from making the remarks or deactivate his microphone.

The plaintiff says the programme therefore became a medium through which the alleged defamatory statements were disseminated to a wide audience.

Reliefs sought

Afenyo-Markin is seeking general damages for libel, aggravated damages and exemplary damages against the defendants.

He is also asking the High Court to order Sammy Gyamfi and Multimedia Group Limited to issue a full, unconditional and unequivocal retraction of the alleged defamatory statements.

He wants the defendants to issue a public apology and publish or broadcast the retraction and apology with substantially the same prominence and reach as the original publication.

The plaintiff is specifically seeking an order requiring the retraction and apology to be broadcast on JoyNews and published on the electronic and social media platforms through which the alleged defamatory material was disseminated.

He is also seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, their servants, agents, assigns and anyone acting under their authority from republishing the alleged defamatory words or statements with the same or substantially similar meaning.

In addition, Afenyo-Markin is claiming GH¢15 million in compensation, together with costs, including legal costs.

He has also asked the court to grant any further or other reliefs it considers appropriate.

The writ commands the defendants to enter an appearance within eight days after service, inclusive of the day of service, failing which judgment may be entered in their absence.

The suit was filed through lawyer F. Paa Kwesi Abaidoo of Dehyena Chambers in West Legon, Accra.

WRIT OF SUMMONS ( OSAHENE ALEXANDER AFENYO-MARKIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

General News

FOUR PROFESSORS SUE TO HALT GIMPA RECTOR SEARCH PROCESS AMID CONTROVERSY

Published

on

Four professors at the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) have filed a lawsuit seeking to halt aspects of the process to select a search committee for the appointment of a new Rector, escalating tensions over the institution’s leadership transition.

The plaintiffs are Professors Lord Mawuko Yevugah, Wisdom Akpalu, Kwami Adanu and Patrick Tandoh-Offin. They filed the action on October 5, 2026, challenging aspects of the process involving the Chairman of GIMPA’s Governing Council, the Institute’s Secretary and the Rector.

At the centre of the dispute is the Convocation register used to determine who could vote for representatives on the Rector Search Committee. The professors contend that about 30 newly appointed or promoted lecturers were included on the register despite questions over whether their appointments had received the necessary approval from the Governing Council.

They argue that allowing the lecturers to participate in the election could undermine the legitimacy of the process and have asked the court to ensure that the selection of the search committee complies with GIMPA’s 2020 Statutes. They also want the committee’s composition and the respective roles of the Governing Council and Convocation clarified.

GIMPA management, however, has indicated that a special ad hoc committee audited the Convocation register and confirmed that those listed had valid appointments, based on Human Resource Management records. Exceptions reportedly applied to staff on leave of absence or secondment.

The Convocation election proceeded on October 6. According to reports, Professor Patrick Tandoh-Offin contested to represent the professorial class but lost to Professor Emmanuel Gyamfi Numapau, who received 118 votes against Tandoh-Offin’s 35.

The legal challenge comes as GIMPA prepares for the end of Rector Professor Samuel Kwaku Bonsu’s tenure in August 2027. The Institute’s statutes require the search process to begin ahead of the incumbent’s departure.

The case raises questions about voting eligibility, institutional governance and the procedures for selecting the next Rector. The court’s determination could affect the process, although the available reports do not establish that an injunction has been granted or that the election

Continue Reading

General News

EPA ORDERS IMMEDIATE HALT TO UNAPPROVED RECLAMATION WORKS NATIONWIDE — GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, CONTRACTORS ON NOTICE

Published

on

The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has ordered an immediate halt to all land reclamation, mine-site rehabilitation, dredging and water-body restoration activities being undertaken without the requisite environmental permits across Ghana.

In a public notice issued on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, the Authority warned that institutions, companies, contractors and individuals operating without its approval must cease work immediately and report to the nearest EPA regional office or its head office for regulatory assessment.

The directive applies to both public and private projects, including government-sponsored, privately funded and donor-supported initiatives. The EPA specifically mentioned the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources, Forestry Commission, Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), Minerals Commission and Mineral Development Fund among the institutions required to ensure compliance.

Under Regulation 40 of the Environmental Protection (Environmental Assessment) Regulations, 2025 (L.I. 2504), reclamation and restoration activities fall within Ghana’s environmental assessment and permitting framework.

The covered activities include rehabilitating abandoned mining sites, backfilling excavated areas, restoring degraded land, revegetation, dredging and desilting rivers, modifying river channels and restoring polluted water bodies, wetlands and aquatic ecosystems.

The Authority stressed that securing a contract, obtaining funding approval, holding a mining lease or receiving authorisation from another public institution does not replace an EPA Environmental Permit. Similarly, consent from traditional authorities, memoranda of understanding and participation in government programmes cannot substitute for the required approval.

Contracting institutions have also been directed to verify the environmental permit status of projects before allowing contractors to mobilise to their sites.

The EPA acknowledged the importance of restoring lands and water bodies damaged by illegal and irresponsible mining but cautioned that rehabilitation efforts must not create further environmental destruction by bypassing regulatory safeguards.

It warned that individuals and institutions that continue unapproved operations after the notice would face action in accordance with applicable Ghanaian laws.

The directive reinforces the Authority’s position that environmental restoration, regardless of its funding source or purpose, must comply with the country’s permitting requirements.

Continue Reading

General News

North Korea and China Open Long-Delayed Bridge

Published

on

The opening of the long-awaited New Yalu River Bridge marks a significant step towards strengthening cross-border transport and trade between China and North Korea.

China and North Korea have officially opened a major bridge linking the two countries, ending a 12-year delay that kept the infrastructure project unused despite its completion in 2014.

The New Yalu River Bridge connects the Chinese border city of Dandong, in Liaoning province, with Sinuiju in North Korea. The four-lane crossing stretches approximately three kilometres across the Yalu River and is expected to improve the movement of goods between the neighbouring countries.

The project was originally intended to begin operating in 2014. However, the opening was postponed for years as infrastructure on the North Korean side, including connecting roads and customs facilities, remained incomplete. Analysts have also pointed to strained bilateral relations and disagreements surrounding economic cooperation as possible contributing factors.

Trade and economic implications

The new crossing is expected to ease pressure on the older China–North Korea Friendship Bridge, which has served as a major route for official trade between the two countries.

By providing additional road capacity, the new bridge could improve freight transportation, reduce congestion and support the movement of essential goods. Its strategic location is particularly important because China remains North Korea’s principal trading partner.

Nevertheless, the opening does not automatically guarantee a rapid increase in trade. International sanctions imposed in response to North Korea’s nuclear and weapons programmes continue to constrain economic activity, while the scale of future commercial traffic will depend on border arrangements and the two governments’ economic policies.

A signal of closer bilateral engagement

The bridge’s inauguration comes amid renewed diplomatic engagement between Beijing and Pyongyang. It also highlights China’s continued economic importance to North Korea as the latter seeks to maintain relationships with key regional partners.

For China, improved transport links could facilitate cross-border commerce and support economic activity in Dandong. For North Korea, the bridge offers additional capacity for importing goods and developing commercial infrastructure around Sinuiju.

However, the project’s long delay illustrates how political disagreements and economic considerations can obstruct infrastructure intended to improve regional connectivity.

What happens next?

Attention will now turn to how quickly the bridge becomes an established route for commercial traffic and whether the additional capacity translates into measurable growth in bilateral trade.

While the opening represents an important infrastructure milestone, its longer-term economic and diplomatic impact will depend on the willingness of both governments to sustain cooperation and the restrictions governing North Korea’s international trade.

The opening ends a lengthy wait for the two countries, but the bridge’s ultimate significance will be measured by the trade and cooperation it enables in the years ahead.

Continue Reading

General News

Kenya Confirms Second Ebola Case as Contact Tracing Intensifies

Published

on

NAIROBI, Kenya — October 15, 2026

Kenya has confirmed a second case of Ebola after a close relative of the country’s first patient tested positive while in quarantine, prompting health authorities to strengthen surveillance and containment measures.

The Kenyan Ministry of Health announced the new infection on Wednesday, October 14, identifying the patient as a 39-year-old man who had been under medical monitoring following his contact with the first case. He developed symptoms, including fever, fatigue and joint pain, on October 13 and was subsequently isolated for testing.

The confirmation comes after a 40-year-old Kenyan man who had been living in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo) died in Nairobi on October 5, shortly after testing positive for the virus. He had travelled through Uganda before arriving in Kenya.

Contact tracing and quarantine efforts

Health authorities identified 128 people who may have been exposed to the first patient. Of these, 108 were reported to be in quarantine in Kenya, while efforts continued to trace other contacts and monitor individuals who may have been exposed.

Officials said the second infection was detected while the patient was already under quarantine, allowing medical teams to isolate him after symptoms emerged.

The Ministry of Health has stressed that there is currently no evidence of wider community transmission linked to the two confirmed cases. However, surveillance and contact-tracing operations remain critical to preventing further infections.

Border screening strengthened

Kenya has stepped up health screening at airports and border crossings as part of efforts to identify possible infections early. The country’s location and travel connections with neighbouring states have also increased the importance of coordination among regional health authorities.

The first patient had travelled from DR Congo, where a major Ebola outbreak is ongoing, through Uganda before reaching Kenya. The case has highlighted the challenges health officials face in detecting infections among people travelling across national borders.

Public urged to remain vigilant

Authorities are urging the public to remain calm, follow official health guidance and promptly report suspected symptoms or potential exposure to health professionals.

Ebola is a serious viral disease that can spread through direct contact with the blood or other bodily fluids of an infected person, or with contaminated materials. Early identification, isolation, appropriate medical care and effective contact tracing are important measures in controlling outbreaks.

Kenya’s response will now focus on monitoring exposed individuals, containing the confirmed infections and preventing further transmission as health officials continue to assess the situation.

Continue Reading

General News

Burnham Seeks Diplomatic Reset as Tensions Between Trump and Zelensky Deepen

Published

on

LONDON — British Prime Minister Andy Burnham says he intends to help restore cooperation between the United States and Ukraine as diplomatic tensions grow following Washington’s reported agreement with Moscow on Russian diesel imports.

Burnham made the remarks ahead of a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at Downing Street, where he sought to reaffirm Britain’s support for Kyiv while avoiding a direct confrontation with US President Donald Trump.

Speaking during Prime Minister’s Questions in Parliament, Burnham said his priority was to help rebuild relations so that American support for Ukraine could be restored.

He described the situation facing Zelensky as particularly difficult, pointing to the challenges Ukraine faces as it prepares for another winter amid its ongoing war with Russia.

The British leader said he had spoken with Zelensky over the weekend and intended to listen carefully to the Ukrainian president’s concerns during their meeting.

Britain pledges continued support for Kyiv

Burnham indicated that Ukraine would receive further assistance from Britain, with plans to accelerate military support and pursue additional measures aimed at increasing pressure on Moscow.

The UK government has also signalled plans to speed up deliveries of air-defence missiles to Ukraine and consider further sanctions against Russia. British officials are expected to encourage international partners to strengthen economic pressure on Moscow, including through restrictions targeting Russian energy exports.

The developments come as Ukraine seeks to maintain support from its Western allies while facing continued Russian attacks and uncertainty over Washington’s policy.

Strained US-Ukraine relations

Relations between Trump and Zelensky have come under renewed pressure following the US president’s reported diesel agreement with Russia and disagreements over the direction of efforts to end the war.

The dispute has raised concerns in Kyiv and among European partners about the durability of American backing for Ukraine. Zelensky has continued to stress the importance of maintaining US cooperation, particularly in areas critical to Ukraine’s defence.

Burnham’s approach appears aimed at preserving diplomatic channels rather than escalating the disagreement publicly. His remarks suggest Britain hopes to encourage renewed dialogue between Washington and Kyiv while continuing to provide assistance of its own.

A difficult diplomatic balancing act

For Britain, the challenge is to demonstrate solidarity with Ukraine without undermining its relationship with the United States, a key partner in European security.

Burnham has presented himself as a potential intermediary at a time when Ukraine needs sustained military and financial assistance and Western governments face pressure to coordinate their responses to Russia.

Whether his efforts will lead to a meaningful improvement in relations between Trump and Zelensky remains uncertain. However, the meeting at Downing Street highlights Britain’s attempt to keep diplomatic cooperation alive as the war and disagreements over its future continue.

Continue Reading

Trending