Former government spokesperson on security, Dr Palgrave Boakye-Danquah, has raised concerns over Ghana’s handling of the growing cocaine trafficking problem, accusing the government of failing to act decisively enough to protect the country’s security and international reputation.

In a zoom meeting with Kojo Preko Dankwa on Kessben Maakye show in Accra, Dr Boakye-Danquah asserted, he has lost confidence in the government, alleging that authorities are “sleeping on the job” while Ghana increasingly becomes a transit point for illicit drugs.
He criticised the government’s proposed meeting to address drug trafficking, arguing that the initiative came too late and should have been undertaken much earlier.

Dr Boakye-Danquah also questioned the effectiveness of Ghana’s security agencies in dealing with the situation.
His concerns come amid allegations that some government officials could be connected to cocaine-related activities. He cited comments attributed to the Interior Minister, Mohammed Muntaka Mubarak, in Parliament that government officials were allegedly involved in cocaine deals.

He further raised questions over the movement of containers from Ghana’s port to France before they were reportedly impounded, arguing that such developments raise serious concerns about the country’s security and border-control systems.

The former security spokesperson also questioned why the President would announce a proposed security meeting publicly without even involving the Interior Minister.

According to him, Ghana has recorded significant cocaine seizures in April, August and September 2026, with the value of the seized consignments estimated at about $800 million.
Dr Boakye-Danquah called on the government to provide clearer answers on the alleged involvement of public officials in the drug trade.
“The government must give us better answers,” he said, while questioning which government officials may be involved in the alleged cocaine dealings.

His comments add to growing public debate over Ghana’s fight against drug trafficking and the effectiveness of the country’s security and law-enforcement institutions.

By Maurice Otoo

Lawyer Dennis Ofori Asiedu, a member of the NDC Communications Team, has cautioned Ghanaians against assuming that drug trafficking is carried out only by easily identifiable criminals, stressing that a drug merchant “may be anybody’s neighbour.”

Speaking of national security and the fight against drug trafficking on Kessben Maakye show in Accra, Ofori Asiedu said protecting Ghana’s borders remains extremely challenging, particularly because farms and communities stretch along parts of the country’s boundaries.

He argued that security agencies cannot win the fight alone and urged citizens to provide useful information to the authorities. According to him, without public cooperation, the work of security agencies becomes “extremely difficult.”
Ofori Asiedu further noted that traffickers may use transit routes without necessarily transporting drugs through the country’s ports, making detection more complicated.

While expressing confidence that Ghana’s security agencies are doing their best to safeguard the country, he acknowledged that lapses can occur.

Turning to recent criticism involving Chief Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie, the lawyer stated, the Ghana Bar Association has become a Chop Bar, questioning what he described as selective outrage from the Ghana Bar Association. He argued that previous Chief Justices had also publicly commended government initiatives, citing comments attributed to former Chief Justices Sophia Akuffo stating that Free SHS is good and will help Ghanaian children therefore parents must commend Nana Akufo Addo.
Additionally he referenced Justice Anin Yeboah once commended COCOBOD for suppling fertilizer to the cocoa farmers knowing it was being sold to them.

He queried “What has Justice Baffoe Bonnie’s comment got to do with the Bar Association launching at CJ for his comment?” he questioned, suggesting that the current criticism is inconsistent with reactions to similar remarks

President John Dramani Mahama has been petitioned to order an investigation into a series of alleged irregularities surrounding the operations and decisions of the Public Utilities Regulatory Commission (PURC).

The petition, dated September 14, 2026, raises serious concerns about the determination of electricity tariffs, the imposition of an EMOP levy, the recovery of charges from electricity consumers and the governance of the PURC.

It also calls for scrutiny of alleged interference in the management of the regulatory body, concerns surrounding the PURC Board and the approval of a tariff for the AKSA Power Takoradi project.

The petitioner is calling for an independent, impartial and comprehensive investigation into the matters raised, arguing that they could have significant implications for consumer protection, fair competition, public finances and confidence in Ghana’s electricity market.

Petition raises red flags over PURC tariff decisions

One of the major concerns raised in the petition relates to what the petitioner describes as alleged preferential electricity tariffs for certain steel companies.

According to the petition, some Ghanaian industrial companies are reportedly paying higher tariffs for electricity than certain steel companies operating under the energy-intensive consumer category.

The petitioner claims that during PURC’s most recent major tariff review, the Commission’s Board approved electricity tariffs for certain steel companies that were allegedly significantly lower than the normal industrial tariff applicable to Ghanaian industrial consumers.

The petition questions the basis for what it describes as the preferential treatment.

‘Why are some companies paying less?’

The petitioner states that, as an interested person whose family owns shares in one of the affected businesses, attempts were made to engage representatives of some of the affected steel companies to understand the basis for the allegedly preferential tariffs.

The concerns raised centre on whether the tariff arrangements were properly determined and whether all industrial consumers are being treated fairly under the regulatory framework.

If established, such disparities could raise questions about fair competition, transparency and equal treatment of electricity consumers, particularly businesses operating within Ghana’s industrial sector.

EMOP levy also comes under scrutiny

The petition also calls for an investigation into the imposition of the EMOP levy, with the petitioner seeking clarity on the circumstances surrounding its introduction and administration.

The matter has been presented as part of broader concerns over how electricity-related charges are determined and recovered from consumers.

The petitioner wants the relevant decisions and processes examined to establish whether they were properly authorised and implemented.

PURC governance questioned

Beyond electricity tariffs, the petition raises concerns about the governance and administration of PURC.

The petitioner is seeking an investigation into what he describes as possible interference in the management of the Commission, as well as concerns relating to the PURC Board.

Questions have also been raised about the conduct and independence of members of the Board and the Executive Secretary.

The petition argues that the independence and credibility of the country’s electricity regulator are critical to maintaining confidence in Ghana’s energy sector.

AKSA Power tariff approval raises questions

Another major issue highlighted in the petition is the approval of a tariff for the AKSA Power Takoradi project.

The petitioner is calling for the circumstances surrounding the tariff approval to be investigated as part of the broader review of PURC’s decisions and regulatory processes.

The AKSA Power matter has therefore been placed alongside the concerns over electricity tariffs, consumer charges and PURC governance as issues requiring presidential attention.

Calls for independent investigation

The petitioner is asking President Mahama to ensure that the allegations are subjected to a thorough and independent investigation rather than being dismissed without scrutiny.

According to the petition, the issues raised have potential implications for consumer protection, fair competition, public finances and confidence in Ghana’s electricity market.

The petitioner also makes a distinction between information personally obtained or verified through official sources and allegations submitted by third parties, stressing the need for investigators to independently establish the facts.

Spotlight turns to PURC

The petition now places the operations and decisions of PURC under renewed scrutiny, particularly regarding how electricity tariffs are determined and how different categories of consumers are treated.

For Ghanaian businesses and consumers already grappling with electricity costs, questions surrounding tariff fairness and transparency are likely to attract significant public interest.

The petition ultimately asks the President to ensure that the allegations are properly investigated and that any wrongdoing established through the process is dealt with accordingly.

For now, the matters remain allegations contained in the petition, and no finding of wrongdoing has been established against PURC officials, Board members or any of the companies mentioned.

The spotlight, however, is now firmly on PURC, its tariff decisions and the regulatory processes surrounding Ghana’s power sector.