General News
Minority Insists GoldBod Must Account for GH¢22bn Reported Loss
The Minority Caucus in Parliament has maintained that the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod) must account for a reported GH¢22 billion financial loss linked to the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme (DGPP) in 2025.
In a statement issued on Wednesday, August 19, 2026, and signed by Minority Leader Osahen Alexander Afenyo-Markin, the Caucus said GoldBod Chief Executive Officer Sammy Gyamfi’s response to concerns raised over the programme had not adequately addressed the financial issues at stake.
The Minority’s statement followed a press conference it held on Tuesday, August 18, on the financial and operational performance of GoldBod and reported losses associated with the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme.
The Caucus said its assessment was based on the International Monetary Fund’s findings on the programme. The IMF’s 2026 report discusses the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme and GoldBod’s evolving role in Ghana’s gold sector.
The Minority argued that Mr Gyamfi had not disputed the IMF’s reported finding of a US$1.7 billion loss under the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme in 2025.
“First, the loss is admitted,” the statement said, adding that the Chief Executive had not disputed the IMF’s finding but had instead sought to determine which institution or officials should be blamed.
According to the Caucus, regardless of which state institution’s balance sheet carries the loss, the financial impact ultimately concerns public funds.
The Minority therefore insisted that the reported loss, estimated at approximately GH¢22 billion, must be properly accounted for.
The Caucus also challenged GoldBod’s explanation of the fees it earned from the programme.
According to the statement, Mr Gyamfi indicated that GoldBod accounted for approximately GH¢133 billion in advances in 2025 and received an assay fee of 0.25 per cent and a service fee of 0.5 per cent.
Based on those figures, the Minority calculated that GoldBod earned about GH¢1 billion in fees from the programme.
The Caucus contrasted that figure with GoldBod’s reported operational surplus of approximately GH¢907 million.
It argued that once the agency fees collected from the programme are separated from GoldBod’s other operations, there would be little or no operational surplus attributable to the programme itself.
“The plain implication of his own numbers is that the operational surplus he is celebrating is smaller than the fee income he collected from a programme that lost the state 22 billion Ghana Cedis,” the statement said.
The Minority consequently called on the GoldBod CEO to provide a clearer explanation of the relationship between the fees earned and the reported financial loss.
The Caucus further accused Mr Gyamfi of taking credit for positive economic developments while distancing GoldBod from the reported downside associated with the programme.
It pointed to improvements in Ghana’s debt-to-GDP position, the increase in international reserves from about US$8.9 billion to US$11.3 billion, and the decline in inflation.
The Minority said GoldBod had been “foremost in taking public credit” for some of these outcomes.
It argued that an institution that claims responsibility for the benefits associated with a policy should also be prepared to accept responsibility for costs arising from the same policy.
The Minority also raised concerns about what it described as shifting arrangements for financing the Ghana Reserves Accumulation and National Assets Protection (GANRAP) programme.
According to the statement, Mr Gyamfi indicated that responsibility for the implementation cost of GANRAP moved from the Bank of Ghana to the Ministry of Finance in July 2026.
The Caucus said GoldBod was subsequently seeking to raise funds independently from August 2026.
It described the movement between three different funding arrangements within six months as evidence that the financing model had not yet been settled.
“Three funding arrangements in six months is not a settled model,” the Minority stated.
The IMF has previously noted that GoldBod’s operational model was significantly expanded from April 2026, with the institution taking over the Bank of Ghana’s role in the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme and handling financing, purchasing, assaying and exporting artisanal gold. From July 1, 2026, the government was to cover operating costs related to gold purchases, with costs subject to a 5 per cent ceiling of the overall cost of gold purchased.
The Minority concluded that the reported GH¢22 billion loss, which it said was contained in the IMF’s Sixth Country Report, must be accounted for.
The Caucus specifically referenced IMF Country Report No. 26/213, issued in August 2026, and maintained that the reported amount represented a financial loss to the Republic of Ghana.
The statement said the issue should not be dismissed simply because the loss appeared on the books of another state institution.
The IMF’s July 2026 assessment confirms that the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme had created a temporary breach of a Bank of Ghana performance criterion because of cost-sharing arrangements, while also noting Ghana’s broader improvements in reserves and macroeconomic stability.
The Minority Leader also criticised the tone adopted by the GoldBod CEO during his response to the Minority’s allegations.
Mr Gyamfi had reportedly used a reference to a “brothel” while dismissing the Minority’s criticisms during the Government Accountability Series.
Mr Afenyo-Markin described the remark as inappropriate for a public official responding to questions about the management of public funds.
“The Chief Executive’s reference to a brothel does not belong in a statement issued by a Public Officer accounting for public funds,” the Minority Leader said.
He added that Ghanaians were demanding financial figures and explanations rather than insults.
“Ghanaians asked for figures. They were given insults. The figures are still outstanding,” he stated.
The dispute comes amid competing interpretations of the financial figures. While the Minority has focused on the reported US$1.7 billion loss associated with the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme, the Institute of Fiscal Policy Governance has argued that GoldBod’s own audited accounts show a GH¢5.44 billion surplus for 2025 rather than a GH¢22 billion loss.
The controversy therefore centres partly on whether the reported losses under the Bank of Ghana’s Domestic Gold Purchase Programme should be treated as losses incurred by GoldBod itself or as financial consequences of a programme implemented through GoldBod on behalf of the central bank.
The Minority, however, maintains that GoldBod cannot distance itself from the financial consequences of transactions it operationally managed and is demanding full accountability for the reported loss.

Business
Gold Prices Rebound as Dollar Retreat Offers Relief to Bullion Market
By KPD News Online Business Desk | October 8, 2026
Gold prices recovered on Thursday after touching a two-month low, as a pullback in the U.S. dollar provided some support to the precious metal.
Spot gold rose about 0.5% to $4,132.66 per ounce by 0140 GMT, while U.S. gold futures for December delivery gained 0.4% to $4,157.60. The rebound followed Wednesday’s decline, when bullion fell to its lowest level since August 5.
The recovery came as the dollar eased from an 18-month peak. Because gold is priced in dollars, a weaker greenback can make the metal less expensive for buyers using other currencies, potentially supporting demand.
Dollar and interest rates remain key
Despite Thursday’s recovery, analysts say the outlook for gold remains uncertain. Higher U.S. Treasury yields and expectations that the Federal Reserve could raise interest rates again have continued to weigh on bullion.
Higher interest rates can reduce the appeal of gold because the metal does not generate interest income.
Market pricing currently points to a relatively low probability of a U.S. rate increase in October, while expectations for a December hike remain considerably higher.
Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone, said gold would need to break above $4,275 an ounce for the short-term outlook to become more constructive.
The World Gold Council has also highlighted the influence of rising U.S. yields and the stronger dollar on gold’s recent weakness. At the same time, global gold exchange-traded funds recorded significant inflows in September despite the fall in prices, pointing to continued investor interest in the metal.
Precious metals also move higher
Other precious metals also recorded gains. Silver was around $60.18 an ounce, while platinum climbed about 2.1% to $1,665 and palladium gained roughly 1.6% to $1,142.86.
For gold traders, attention now remains firmly on the U.S. dollar, Treasury yields and signals from the Federal Reserve as investors assess whether Thursday’s rebound marks the beginning of a broader recovery or simply a temporary pause in the recent decline.
General News
Hormuz shipping traffic falls to two-month low after tanker attacks
SINGAPORE, October 8, 2026 — Commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has fallen to its lowest level in more than two months, as a renewed wave of attacks and security threats pushes shipping operators to reassess the risks of using the strategically important waterway.
Vessels navigating the Strait of Hormuz amid heightened regional tensions
Data from maritime analytics firm Kpler showed that only seven commodity-carrying vessels crossed the strait on Tuesday, the lowest daily figure recorded since July 23. The decline comes after tanker-related incidents in the region reached their highest weekly level since the start of the ongoing U.S.-Israeli war with Iran.
The reduction in vessel traffic is also reflected in crude oil flows. Kpler data indicated that crude shipments through Hormuz fell 27% from a wartime peak, to about 10.1 million barrels per day. That remains substantially below the waterway’s pre-war level.
Oil tanker sailing through the Strait of Hormuz
The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most important energy corridors. Before the conflict, roughly 20% of global crude oil and liquefied natural gas supplies moved through the passage, making any prolonged disruption a major concern for energy markets.
SECURITY CONCERNS GROW
Shipping activity has weakened as vessels face greater uncertainty over their safety. Reuters reported that at least 12 tanker-related incidents were recorded between September 28 and October 5, including attacks, attempted attacks and harassment. The Joint Maritime Information Center said the incidents reflected heightened activity around key shipping routes.
A separate tanker incident near Qatar has added to concerns about the wider security environment in the Gulf. The latest attacks have increased insurance and operational risks for companies moving oil and other commodities through the region.
Despite the sharp reduction in traffic through Hormuz, Middle Eastern oil exports have not collapsed. Alternative routes and increased shipments from areas outside the strait have helped keep regional exports flowing. Reuters reported that exports from the Gulf of Oman coast and the Red Sea had risen to around 6.7 million barrels per day, more than twice their pre-war level.
OIL PRICES UNDER PRESSURE
The shipping slowdown has nevertheless added fresh uncertainty to global energy markets. Brent crude was trading above $100 a barrel on Thursday, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate was also higher as traders assessed the possibility of further supply disruptions.
Oil tankers in the Gulf as Hormuz shipping activity falls
For countries that depend heavily on imported fuel, prolonged disruption around Hormuz could increase transportation, electricity and consumer costs if alternative supplies and shipping routes become more expensive.
For now, the latest figures suggest that vessels are still moving through the waterway, but at considerably reduced levels. The key question for energy markets is whether the decline represents a temporary reaction to heightened attacks or the beginning of a longer period of restricted maritime traffic.
General News
Hezbollah Reportedly Receives $200 Million From Iran for Lebanon’s Displaced
BEIRUT, Lebanon — October 8, 2026: Hezbollah has reportedly received $200 million from Iran to provide financial assistance to Lebanese families displaced by this year’s war with Israel, according to two people with direct knowledge of the transfer.
The reported payment would represent the first major assistance from Hezbollah to supporters affected by the conflict, after hundreds of thousands of people were forced from their homes during Israeli bombardments and ground operations in southern Lebanon and other Hezbollah strongholds.
According to the sources, the funds arrived in Lebanon last month despite mounting US pressure on Iran and increasingly difficult channels for transferring money to Hezbollah. Intermediaries involved in moving the funds reportedly charged a 20% fee, reflecting the financial and legal risks associated with the transaction.
A Hezbollah official confirmed that an amount of money had been secured and said the group would announce a distribution plan, but did not publicly confirm that the funds came from Iran.
$3,000 planned for some families
The reported plan would initially provide approximately $3,000 per family, with priority given to people from villages that have been destroyed or remain inaccessible because of the conflict.
One source estimated that around 50,000 families could be covered by the initial payments.
The development comes after months of criticism over the limited assistance available to Hezbollah’s displaced supporters. The group’s ability to provide financial support and reconstruction assistance has historically been an important part of its relationship with communities in southern Lebanon and Beirut’s southern suburbs.
After the 2006 war with Israel, Hezbollah distributed cash assistance and helped finance reconstruction in areas heavily damaged by fighting. This year’s conflict, however, has produced extensive destruction while reconstruction has been much slower.
Washington disputes the reported transfer
The United States has challenged the claim that the $200 million was transferred from Iran.
US State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott said the money was not there and accused Hezbollah of attempting to bolster its image by promoting what Washington described as false reports of Iranian financial support.
Iranian officials and Lebanon’s government did not immediately respond to requests for comment, according to the Reuters report.
Iran has historically been a major financial backer of Hezbollah, although Tehran does not publicly acknowledge financing the organization. US officials have previously reported substantial Iranian financial support for the group.
A difficult road ahead
The reported transfer comes as Hezbollah faces serious financial pressures following the conflict and intensified US sanctions targeting Iranian and Hezbollah-linked financial networks.
The war has also left large areas of southern Lebanon heavily damaged. Lebanese officials have warned that rebuilding the country following successive conflicts since 2024 could cost more than $27 billion.
For displaced families, the immediate challenge remains finding secure housing and restoring basic livelihoods. Whether the reported funds reach the intended recipients — and how widely the payments are distributed — is expected to become clearer once Hezbollah announces its assistance programme.
The reported $200 million transfer has not been independently confirmed by Iran, and Washington disputes the claim.
General News
AU Unveils Africa Credit Rating Agency to Challenge Global Ratings Giants
Port Louis, Mauritius — October 7, 2026: The African Union has launched the Africa Credit Rating Agency (AfCRA) in Mauritius, establishing the continent’s first Africa-focused credit rating institution as African governments seek a stronger voice in international financial markets.
The agency was officially unveiled in Port Louis on Wednesday after years of discussions and institutional preparation led by the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) under an AU mandate. African leaders endorsed the idea of a continental credit-rating agency in 2018.
AfCRA is intended to provide independent assessments of the creditworthiness of African governments, sub-national entities, businesses and financial institutions. Its methodology is expected to draw more heavily on African data, economic conditions and local expertise while complementing, rather than replacing, existing international ratings agencies.
Challenging the established ratings system
For years, African policymakers have criticised the dominant international ratings firms — S&P Global, Moody’s and Fitch — arguing that their assessments can fail to fully capture conditions on the continent and contribute to higher borrowing costs.
The AU says AfCRA is designed to provide investors with additional information and context when evaluating African economies. The agency is also expected to help address gaps in ratings coverage, with the AU saying that 23 of its 55 member states currently do not have ratings from the three major global agencies.
Supporters argue that a deeper understanding of African economies could help reduce the risk premium attached to some African borrowers and improve access to international capital.
Focus on credibility and independence
Despite being created under an AU mandate, AfCRA is designed to operate as a private-sector-driven, self-funded and independent institution. The AU says governments cannot own shares in the agency, a measure intended to protect it from political influence and strengthen its credibility with investors.
That independence will be closely watched. Credit ratings influence how investors assess risk and can affect the interest rates governments and companies pay when raising money. Any perception that ratings are politically influenced could undermine the agency’s purpose.
A potential boost for African capital markets
The launch comes as many African governments continue to face significant financing pressures and high debt-servicing costs. The AU sees AfCRA as part of a broader effort to strengthen the continent’s financial architecture and increase Africa’s influence over how its economies are assessed globally.
The agency will therefore face a major test: whether it can establish a reputation for accurate, transparent and internationally credible ratings while offering a genuinely Africa-focused perspective.
Its success could potentially give African governments and companies another avenue for accessing capital and provide international investors with additional information when making decisions about the continent.
For the AU, however, the launch represents more than a new financial institution. It is being presented as part of a broader push for greater financial sovereignty and a stronger African voice in the global financial system.
Entertainment
Nana Akua Abuse Case: Husband’s Court Appearance Put on Hold
The Ghana Police Service has confirmed that Harold Norman, husband of fashion personality Rosemond Akua Adobea, popularly known as Nana Akua Addo, could not appear before court on Wednesday, October 7, after being admitted to hospital.
Norman was expected to be arraigned in connection with allegations of domestic abuse made against him by his wife. The Criminal Investigations Department (CID) said his lawyer notified investigators that he had been hospitalised and was therefore unable to attend the scheduled court proceedings.
The Police said officers from the Domestic Violence and Victim Support Unit (DOVVSU) subsequently visited the hospital to verify the claim. Investigators are also monitoring the situation and are expected to ensure that Norman appears before court immediately after his discharge.
The development follows a petition Nana Akua submitted to the Director-General of the CID on August 20, 2026. According to the Police, she alleged that her husband had subjected her to physical, emotional and economic abuse.
Police investigations also established that a case involving the couple had previously been handled by DOVVSU at the Lakeside and Ministries Police Stations in July.
Norman was arrested at his residence on August 27 to assist with investigations. After giving a caution statement, he was granted police enquiry bail with two sureties on August 29 while investigations continued.
The Police have also disclosed that they are working with the Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Protection to provide social welfare support for Nana Akua and her children.
The case has attracted significant public attention following the circulation of videos and images on social media. Norman’s lawyers have separately denied allegations against their client and urged the media to exercise caution in reporting matters that are before investigators and the courts.
The Police have maintained that the allegations remain subject to investigation and have reiterated their commitment to handling domestic violence complaints professionally and fairly.
-
General News1 week agoFidelity Bank Chairman Named Ghana’s Topmost Transformational Board Chair 2026
-
Technology2 weeks agoRolls-Royce Expands Aviation Business with Major Philippine Airlines Engine Agreement
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoRas Caleb assesses institutions under the Tourism Ministry, highlighting key roles.
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoRas Caleb Appiah-Levi: The musician, Pan-Africanist and organiser whose career spans four decades
-
Entertainment1 week agoRas Caleb Appiah-Levi Reflects on Death, Wealth and Equality: “Death Neither Knows Rich Nor Poor”
-
Business2 weeks agoRev. Dr. Christian Kwetey Kweitsu Honoured for Excellence in Audiology Practice in Kigali
-
General News2 weeks agoSudan Chemical Weapons Allegations: UN Signals Readiness for Possible Investigation
-
General News1 week agoWhen 5 oranges become mangoes – Teacher’s viral classroom moment sparks fresh debate over teachers’ grievances
