A police officer, identified as Constable Redeemer Owusu, has reportedly been lynched by an angry mob, with details emerging on the circumstances surrounding the tragic incident.

The incident has drawn attention to the growing danger of mob violence and the consequences of individuals taking the law into their own hands.

According to reports, Constable Owusu became the target of an angry crowd before the situation escalated into a fatal attack.

The circumstances leading to the confrontation, including what triggered the mob’s anger and the events immediately preceding the attack, are now coming under scrutiny as details of the incident emerge.

The death of the police officer has raised fresh concerns about mob justice, public safety and the need for suspects to be handled through lawful processes rather than by crowds.

Authorities are expected to investigate the circumstances surrounding the incident and establish the individuals responsible for the officer’s death.

The incident also highlights the risks faced by police officers and other security personnel while carrying out their duties in communities.

More details on the circumstances surrounding Constable Redeemer Owusu’s death are expected as investigations continue.

The European Union (EU) Ambassador has paid a courtesy call on the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) as part of efforts to strengthen engagement and cooperation between the EU and the Ghana Police Service.

The high-level meeting brought together the EU diplomatic representative and Ghana’s top police leadership for discussions on issues of mutual interest relating to security, law enforcement and institutional cooperation.

The courtesy call provided an opportunity for both sides to exchange views and explore areas where continued collaboration could support effective policing and security efforts.

The engagement also underscores the importance of international partnerships in addressing emerging security challenges and strengthening cooperation between law-enforcement institutions.

Further details on the specific issues discussed and any outcomes from the meeting are expected to be communicated by the relevant authorities.

By Angel No Lie | KPD Online | September 19, 2026 | Washington, D.C.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — President Donald Trump has announced that CNN, Politico and MS NOW are being barred from the White House, accusing the three organizations of repeatedly publishing what he described as “fake news.”

Trump made the announcement on Truth Social on Friday, September 18, saying the restrictions were effective immediately. He did not identify a single report that prompted the decision, instead telling reporters that it was based on what he called a cumulative pattern of coverage over several years.

The announcement has opened a new dispute between the White House and major news organizations, with questions now focusing on how broadly the restrictions will be implemented and whether they can withstand legal challenges.

Today’s Strait of Hormuz Mystery: Where Did the Oil Go? | The New Republic

Trump says more outlets could face restrictions

Trump said the three outlets had been targeted because of their coverage of his administration. He also suggested that other organizations could be added to the list.

When asked about possible additional restrictions, Trump mentioned The New York Times and The Washington Post, referring to them as “fake news” outlets.

The president did not initially provide details about whether the ban would cover all White House grounds, specific events, press briefings, the White House press pool or other forms of presidential access.

Reuters reported that the White House was informing the affected organizations that they would be barred from the grounds beginning Saturday, although the exact scope of the restrictions remained unclear.

US-POLITICS-TRUMP

MS NOW reports journalists were denied entry

By Saturday morning, MS NOW said its journalists had been denied access to the White House grounds, providing an early indication that at least part of the announced restrictions was being implemented.

The network said it would take steps to defend its First Amendment rights.

On Friday, journalists from CNN, MS NOW and Politico were still working at the White House after Trump’s announcement, according to reports from the Associated Press and Reuters.

US-POLITICS-LEAVITT

CNN and Politico challenge the move

CNN said it stood behind its White House journalists and argued that its reporting is constitutionally protected.

The network said it has a right under the U.S. Constitution to report on the government without interference and described a potential ban as an assault on those rights.

Politico similarly said it would continue covering the current administration and future administrations and would defend its First Amendment rights against restrictions.

Vice President Vance Holds White House Press Briefing

First Amendment questions

The announcement has prompted debate over the constitutional limits of presidential control over media access.

Reuters reported that presidents have broad discretion over access to certain limited events, including some Oval Office meetings and small press pools. However, broader exclusions from White House press facilities or generally available credentials could face stronger First Amendment and due-process challenges.

Legal experts cited by Reuters said the constitutional issues could depend significantly on the precise scope and implementation of the ban.

The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University has argued that excluding journalists from a White House press pool because of their viewpoints could raise serious First Amendment concerns.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Holds Briefing At The White House

A longer confrontation with the White House press corps

The latest dispute follows a series of clashes between the Trump administration and news organizations during the president’s second term.

One earlier dispute involved the Associated Press, whose journalists were restricted from certain presidential events after the news organization continued using “Gulf of Mexico” rather than Trump’s preferred “Gulf of America.” The AP subsequently challenged the restrictions in court, and that litigation remains ongoing.

The administration has also changed how journalists gain access to certain presidential events, including giving the White House greater control over portions of the press pool.

Trump’s latest announcement therefore adds another layer to an already contentious relationship between the administration and parts of the U.S. news media.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Speaks To Reporters Outside The White House

What happens next?

The immediate question is whether the White House will fully implement the restrictions against CNN, Politico and MS NOW and what access, if any, will remain available to their journalists.

Legal action is also possible. Reuters reported that the breadth of the restrictions could be important in determining the constitutional issues raised by the move.

For the affected news organizations, the dispute is now both an access issue and a legal question about the relationship between the executive branch and the press.

An Assin Fosu District Court Judge has recounted an extraordinary incident in which suspected MoMo fraudsters allegedly attempted to scam him shortly after he had sentenced a person for a similar offence.

His Worship Abdul Majid Iliasu said the attempted fraud happened as he was leaving the court premises after proceedings.

The incident, according to the judge, involved the familiar tactic of claiming that money had been mistakenly transferred into a person’s account and asking the recipient to return it.

Fraudsters allegedly targeted judge after court

According to the judge, an unknown caller contacted him and claimed that he had accidentally sent money into the judge’s account.

The caller allegedly asked the judge to return the supposed funds.

Shortly after the call, the judge said he received a text message purportedly from a telecommunications service provider, apparently confirming that the alleged transfer had been made.

However, rather than acting immediately, the judge checked the information more carefully.

His further checks, he said, revealed that the message was fake.

“I realised they were fraudsters”

Recounting the incident, Judge Iliasu said the approach immediately raised suspicion because it matched a common method used by MoMo fraudsters.

“After further checks, I realised they were fraudsters because that was their modus operandi,” he said.

The judge’s experience highlighted how fraudsters can attempt to exploit the trust of mobile money users by creating the impression that a genuine transaction has taken place.

The irony after sentencing a MoMo fraudster

What made the incident particularly striking was its timing.

The suspected scam attempt occurred shortly after the judge had sentenced Prince Mensah, who had been convicted of defrauding mobile money vendor Alice Fofie of GH¢37,000.

The court imposed a fine of GH¢9,000, with the judge indicating that the punishment was intended to deter others from engaging in similar offences.

Moments later, the judge himself became the target of what he believed was an attempted MoMo scam.

“No respect to anybody”

The judge appeared amused by the irony of the situation but used the incident to highlight the growing threat posed by electronic transaction-related crimes.

He remarked that suspected fraudsters appeared willing to target anyone, regardless of their position in society.

“These guys show no respect to anybody, no matter your status in society,” he said.

Judge calls for tougher action

Judge Iliasu also expressed concern about the increasing incidence of electronic transaction-related crimes in the Assin Fosu area.

He called on the Ghana Police Service and relevant cybersecurity authorities to intensify efforts to identify, investigate and prosecute perpetrators of MoMo fraud and other electronic transaction-related offences.

The judge’s comments came while he was presiding over a separate kidnapping case involving four suspects accused of abducting 30-year-old Bismark Amoh.

Amoh was reportedly held in Kumasi from September 6 to September 11, with one of the suspects also linked to a separate allegation involving MoMo fraud.

A warning to MoMo users

The incident serves as another reminder of the need for mobile money users to verify transactions directly through their accounts before responding to claims of mistaken transfers.

A text message appearing to come from a telecommunications provider should not, on its own, be treated as proof that money has been received.

For the Assin Fosu judge, the attempted scam provided a striking real-life example of the very offence he had just been dealing with in court—and a reminder that MoMo fraudsters can target anyone, regardless of status.